Showing posts with label Managment Training. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Managment Training. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Less Time + More Meaning = Better Meetings

Less Time + More Meaning = Better Meetings
When was the last time you left a meeting and thought to yourself "Wow! That was a great meeting?" Let's assume that this moment has happened for you at least once in your career. What made that particular meeting so great? Was it just luck? Whatever made that meeting so great – did you attempt to replicate it so all of your other meetings turn out so well?

So, what makes for a great meeting and how can you ensure that all your meetings are great? For me it’s simple. The best meetings are the ones that are quick, meaningful and result in change or action following the meeting.

Meaningful, effective meetings should always include the following:
Structure - A known structure allows the participants to come prepared and ready to contribute.

Ground Rules - With some basic rules for how to hold a meeting attendees can come ready to maintain the proper focus on the meeting topic.

People - It's important to have the right people in the meeting. If someone is unable to attend, they should send a delegate to the meeting to represent them and their department, division, or work area.

Outcomes - With a focus on defined, specific outcomes you’ll provide meaning to the meeting.

Actions - In order to accomplish the desired outcomes, participants will need to have list of actionable items moving forward. Let’s face it, if all the group does is sit around and talk about the issues, has anything really been accomplished? The most meaningful item coming out of any meeting is a list of what is to be done, which is recorded, distributed, and referenced at the next meeting.

Important elements for more meaningful meetings include:
An Agenda. Knowing the order and the list of activities to take place brings a structure and stability to the discussion.

Meeting Roles. Having pre-defined roles for participants keeps the group more engaged. Three recommended meeting roles are as follows:
1. The Facilitator directs the meeting and helps keep the pace flowing.
2. The Action Taker keeps a written record of the meeting and any resulting actions moving forward.
3. The Participants. The Meeting Participants are responsible for taking part, adding information, and following-up on actions.

The Action Register. An Action Register is a tool used to document actions taken by the participants at the meeting. This powerful tool increases accountability by recording actions, denoting the person responsible for those actions, and the date they will have their action completed.

A Scorecard. A Business Scorecard allows participants to know and track their progress. Whether the scorecard is for a specific project, department, or the entire company the information is important for the group to understand where they need to focus their corrective actions and current efforts.

A Time Limit. A meeting time limit will allow participants to focus on the topic, while at the same time provide incentive to make the time meaningful. Teams may require regular, shorter meetings to accomplish the stated purpose or outcome. You can’t always solve all issues or complete all your tasks in one long-running, bloated meeting.

By implementing more structure, introducing meeting roles, and having established outcomes with action items you’ll be able to save time in meetings and increase the amount of time taking action outside of the meetings.

What else would you suggest doing to make meetings more meaningful?

--- <> ---


Learn strategies for holding meaningful meetings and more at our next public workshop.

Please contact CSI to learn how to develop sustainable, standard meeting processes.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Measuring Your Training Effectiveness

One of the most crucial components of a training program is often overlooked - a method to audit training implementation. All too frequently, organizations implement a training plan without a clear definition of the results they require from the training, or the appropriate means to achieve the results.

Without a plan, training efforts often yield no results or unintended results leadership was not expecting. By knowing what is expected of the training and the appropriate measures to gauge effectiveness, leadership has the ability to objectively analyze all results and modify their training plan as necessary.

To circumvent this difficulty, leadership must first determine their current state and their desired future state. Leadership must then define the specific skills that are necessary to achieve their desired state. Finally, leadership must determine the outcomes they expect to see as a result of training. While this may seem like a great deal to accomplish before the training actually begins, it is in fact these steps that will go the farthest in ensuring the highest possible return on training investment.

Based on the training 'pre-work' information, leadership has the tools to develop and implement an effective training plan. Some components of an effective training plan include: training outcomes, standard operating procedures, and an audit process to create an environment of continuous improvement and accountability for training implementation. When establishing an audit process, leadership must develop a schedule that determines the frequency of training process audits, a corrective action plan development for skill deficiencies, as well as recognition system for skill proficiency. By employing a process of audit, follow-up, and re-audit, the skill acquisition and implementation become a part of the culture, rather than a typical 'program of the month' initiative.

-article from "Living Your Leadership Legacy" Newsletter
by Competitive Solutions, Inc.


Competitive Solutions, Inc.(CSI) is a leadership training and consulting company that specializes in helping organizations improve communication, develop meaningful business scorecards, create accountability at all levels and set behavioral expectations using a business alignment system called Process Based Leadership

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Competitive Solutions, Inc. Works with Red River Army Depot to Get Bradley Tanks Back to Iraq

The Army will repair over 1,000 Bradley Tanks this year at a cost of $1.2 million each. An additional 400 will be upgraded with the latest electronics at an average cost of $3.5 million.

Lt. Gen. Stephen Speakes, who oversees the Army’s re-equipping effort, says the Bradley's protection and firepower make it ideal for soldiers in a tough fight. "The Bradley is a remarkable platform," he says. "It can hold a squad of infantrymen and provide direct-fire support. The 25mm gun is a wonderful cannon. It gives you enormous flexibility. It's amazingly agile, very reliable and responsive. This vehicle will flat kick a--."

Competitive Solutions, Inc. began working with the Red River Army Depot (RRAD) two years ago. The Army Depot is responsible for repairing the Bradley Tanks to get them back to the war fighters in Iraq. The last new Bradley rolled off the assembly line in 1995, and the Army plans to use the armored vehicles for decades. This makes the work done by the Depot all the more important.

RRAD realized that they needed to implement a process to get the tanks delivered in less time with more reliability. They turned to Competitive Solutions, Inc. CSI assisted RRAD in improving communications, developing meaningful business scorecards, creating accountability at all levels and setting behavioral expectations using a business alignment system called Process Based Leadership®. In addition to working with the Red River Army Depot; CSI works with Corpus Christi Army Depot, Rock Island Arsenal, Tobyhanna Army Depot, Sierra Army Depot, Blue Grass Army Depot and Letterkenny Army Depot. Regardless of the industry, organizations search for a competitive means to maximize workforce potential, reduce cost and overhead, and increase quality.

Because no new Bradleys are being built, the Pentagon must rely on an extensive network to keep the Army’s 4,700 Bradleys rolling. "There is no dealership to take these vehicles to,” states Col. Paul Lepine, Program Manager for the Army’s heavy brigade combat teams. "When we service them, we need to take them through this extensive process that costs a lot because of the extensive touch labor and cost of materials. It took a year or more to repair Bradleys at the start of the war. But most vehicles can now be returned to service in five months. The quicker we can get these Bradleys back to the war fighters in Iraq the better. They’re lifesavers!"

(Segments of this article were taken from USA Today, June 26, 2008)

Competitive Solutions, Inc.(CSI) is a leadership training and consulting company that specializes in helping organizations improve communication, develop meaningful business scorecards, create accountability at all levels and set behavioral expectations using a business alignment system called Process Based Leadership.®